MAHİR ÇAYAN
UNINTERRUPTED REVOLUTION AND
2. INTERNATIONAL
The class struggle of the proletariat is national in form, not in content. In Mahir Çayan's work titled Uninterrupted Revolution 1, the Marxist theory of revolution is examined. Mahir Çayan critically reveals that Marxism is a guide to action, according to its historical chronology. Mahir Çayan, a true Marxist-Leninist, criticizes all kinds of reformism like his predecessors. Maex in Çayan's work. and finds Engels' statement that capitalism entered a period of general and permanent crises with the world trade crisis of 1847 incorrect. As can be seen in the revolutionary theories of Marx and Engels, who thought that there would be a permanent revolution in continental Europe between 1847 and 1850 and then said that they were wrong, economic and social determinism predominates, not revolutionary initiative. And the role of the revolutionary initiative is more secondary. However, the relative importance of the revolutionary initiative paralleled the gradual shift of the center of the revolution from the west - England to the east. is also increasing. However, capitalism was in a period of rise in that era, and capitalism entered a period of constant crises during the imperialist period. Capitalism was not the capitalism of Marx and Engels. Capitalism has entered an age of constant crises. The theory of permanent revolution, which Marx and Engels described as erroneous in the pre-monopoly period, became the theory of revolution of Marxism in the period of constant crises of capitalism.
It was happening. That's why Marx and
Engels after 1856
This theory of revolution they gave up
capitalism's permanent and general
Russia during the depression
like belated bourgeois
On the verge of democratic revolution
The proletariat of a country with
It is the only and correct theory of revolution.
Leninist uninterrupted revolution
theory of capitalism
It is the theory of the period of conflict.
initiated by the 2nd International
orthodox distortion of marxism
The Mensheviks were practicing it. 2.
parties of the international
a peaceful state of capitalism
improvement
selection obtained in the trial
in the intoxication of their victory.
This new era of capitalism
They never understood. Temporary
a period of peace
They thought it would continue. This
parties in concrete situations
Aside from the concrete analysis
An act of Marxism by leaving
is the manual and the date
become rich within
forgetting that Marx and
Engels for exceptional circumstances.
even what they say
They generalized it completely
They fell into dogmatism.
Marx and Engels' pre-monopoly
memories regarding the period
preserved in orthodoxy
to freeze
their objective situation
It seemed appropriate. And this
dogmatism is also
their betrayal and
an ideological cover for their cowardice
It was happening. Marx and Engels
productive forces of capitalism
What he has just developed is contrary to them
to the rising period where it does not fall
related to the evolutionary period
The revolution they predicted
theory and working style
tactics of capitalism in general
socialist to the depression period
to the period of revolutions
They were trying to implement it. 2.
international pacifists
This is how Marxism
While dogmatizing Marxism
accepted as a guide to action
Lenin explains concrete situations
by making a concrete analysis
capitalism to imperialism
Close up of the transformation process
He was watching. According to Lenin, period.
The period of Marx and Engels
Capitalism was not a new
had entered the phase. Capitalism
Marx ve Engels in 1847-50
entered between the period
What they think is permanent and general
life to the period of depressions.
into the conflict process
has entered. And Lenin is a monopolist
became more evident in the period
capitalism is unstable and
correct discontinuous development
by observing from now on in one country
The victory of socialism is possible
He concluded that it was. Lenin
economic and political development
not in equal proportion
It is the absolute law of capitalism.
Lenin e gore Marx ve Engels in
this outdated suggestion
dogmatizing and repeating 2.
international party and
spokesmen to the bourgeoisie
uvaziye
nothing but service
It does not. Stalin in short
As he said, Russia and
What happened to Lenin 1840-50
between Germany and Marx
to Engels and
has arrived.
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder